Advertisement
I’ve been doing background research on shiatsu and I am becoming slightly confused about what exactly Shiatsu is. This is primarily because of the seeming conflict between shiatsu that is primarily with the hands (Namikoshi) and shiatsu that does not emphasize handwork and incorporates the elbows and knees for pressure application (such as Zen shiatsu). I am currently practicing Zen Shiatsu in Japan and even though I have been using my knees and elbows to apply pressure to many points on the body, I do not understand why two different schools of shiatsu are so different.
Referencing from The Complete Book of Shiatsu Therapy by Toru Namikoshi -www.amazon.com/exec/obido...152-8011052 there are five sense receptors in the skin all over the body. These sense receptors relate to the brain feelings of deep pressure, heat, cold, light touch and pain. All of these sense receptors are most abundant in the fingertips, palms, and soles of the feet. Based on this information is seems that using the hands is easiest way for one to notice reactions of points.
At the reverse end of the spectrum, it appears through my own personal experience in Zen Shiatsu, that through the use of the elbows and knees one is able to maintain a solid triangular base while giving. This base is created without the receiver being included, as oppose to a base when the hands are used integrating the receiver into that triangular base causing equal pressure on them or a less solid base. For application, this seems to be the better solution.
I am not sure if this is just case based, for example this is primarily also comparing using a futon or raised table, and in certain postures in Zen Shiatsu the giver forms a triangular base with the receiver, but at the same time I feel less off balance. If anyone can help shed light on my confusion I would greatly appreciate it.
Referencing from The Complete Book of Shiatsu Therapy by Toru Namikoshi -www.amazon.com/exec/obido...152-8011052 there are five sense receptors in the skin all over the body. These sense receptors relate to the brain feelings of deep pressure, heat, cold, light touch and pain. All of these sense receptors are most abundant in the fingertips, palms, and soles of the feet. Based on this information is seems that using the hands is easiest way for one to notice reactions of points.
At the reverse end of the spectrum, it appears through my own personal experience in Zen Shiatsu, that through the use of the elbows and knees one is able to maintain a solid triangular base while giving. This base is created without the receiver being included, as oppose to a base when the hands are used integrating the receiver into that triangular base causing equal pressure on them or a less solid base. For application, this seems to be the better solution.
I am not sure if this is just case based, for example this is primarily also comparing using a futon or raised table, and in certain postures in Zen Shiatsu the giver forms a triangular base with the receiver, but at the same time I feel less off balance. If anyone can help shed light on my confusion I would greatly appreciate it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Different Shiatsu's Namikoshi and Zen
Wed, March 9, 2005 - 8:50 PMThis is from "Shia5su, The complete guide" by Chris Jarmey and Gabriel Mojay
I think it may help you a little.
The official recognition of Shiatsu in Japan can be mainly attributed to the efforts of Tokujiro Namikoshi, who established the Shiatsu Institute of Therapy in Hokkaido in 1925 and the Japan Shiatsu Institute in1940 (subsequently renamed the Japan Shiatsu School). His success was no doubt due to a combination of his obvious tactile sensitivity and the effort he put into aligning Shiatsu with Western medicine. In this way, his method benefited from the general trend towards Westernization.
The traditional, philosophical and medical framework was reintegrated into Shiatsu by Shizuto Masunaga, who taught at the Japan Shiatsu Institute for ten years before opening his own school known as the Iokai Shiatsu Center in Tokyo. Also highly developed in tactile sensitivity, Shizto Masunaga had an interest in integrating the ancient medical model with Western physiology. His main contribution to Shiatsu before his death was to establish the full influence of the major Energy Channels over the surface of the body, and how to fully effect a person's psychological/physical balance through optimum connection with these Channels.
Consequently, in Japan today, there are two distinct methods of Shiatsu: the method developed by Tokujiro Namikoshi, and Iokai Shiatsu as developed by the late Shizuto Masunaga. Namokoshi's style is characterized by applying pressure to specific reflex points which relate to the central and autonomic nervous system, whereas Masunaga's styleis characterized by sensitivity to the Energy Channels which are the manifestation of body/mind function, from the viewpoint of Oriental Medicine. Masunaga also introduced the dimension of 'support and connection' by realizing that Shiatsu treatment is much less painful, more nurturing and energetically more effective if both hands are kept apart, yet in contact with the recipient, so that one hand is used as a 'listening' hand, while the other applies technique.
Ultimately, however, the effectiveness of Shiatsu depends more upon the attitude, proficiency and attunement of the practitioner, than upon a particular style. -
-
Re: Different Shiatsu's Namikoshi and Zen
Thu, March 10, 2005 - 8:13 PMI practice Zen Shiatsu, Masunaga style and I just use the palms of my hand and my thumbs. The way I learned Zen shiatsu is to assess what is out of balance in the hara (kyo/jitsu), then bring the body into balance by working those meridians. In this way the mind/body/spirit comes into balance and the person feels balanced, relaxed and almost magically better. By bringing the person to a balanced state of being the body can heal itself. This is zen. I think it's amazing. -
-
Re: Different Shiatsu's Namikoshi and Zen
Wed, March 16, 2005 - 9:34 AMThere are elements of both schools that make sense to me. I like to be open to the different ideas, experimenting, always finding out what seems to be working for the client and myself. I think I'm more interested in the poetic spirit involved, the frame of mind that I maintain while doing the shiatsu, a quality of openness, innocence, even emptiness, just sensing and responding naturally, rather than automatically adopting one or the other specific technique and thereby imposing a system onto the person. I feel I'm slowly moving toward a way that is my own, that is based on what I perceive according to my own poetry.
On the other hand (there's always another hand), I may not always be in the perfect mental space to give shiatsu, and a solid technique can help filter out any personal weirdness I might be bringing to the table.
-
-
-
Re: Different Shiatsu's Namikoshi and Zen
Wed, September 14, 2005 - 7:07 PMHello,
I am a Masunaga style shiatsu practitioner (from the same school as Ursula actually). I use palms, thumbs, knees, elbows, knuckles, feet, forearms. Of course, I've also studied tui na, deep tissue, and Barefoot Shiatsu, so that influences things.
I think that something to consider is that both Namikoshi, and Masunaga were innovators. Namikoshi basically invented Shiatsu as a distinct style from Amma. Amma involved many different types of hand techniques, whereas Shiatsu involved only one... press/release... hence the name "shiatsu" meaning "finger pressure". Masunaga was a student and teacher of Namikoshi's style for quite some time (ten years I think) before he started 'feeling meridians', and researcing on his own. I get the impression from Masunaga's text 'Zen Shiatsu' that part of his techniques called 'shiatsu without fingers' were an answer to injuries and soreness sustained by practicing the very yang, one tool Namikoshi style (this is just my impression though). Masunaga was also one of the first to mention the idea of Ho/Sha (tonification/sedation) therapy in Shiatsu. The section in Zen shiatsu called 'shiatsu without fingers' is right in front of a section called 'how to sedate' where more elbow techniques are shown.
In my own experience, energetically it feels like Namikoshi's style is working with a singular technique on a singular energetic level of the person - the physical... this can be seen by noting that his Theory is all western anatomically oriented.
Masunaga's Shiatsu claims (and in my experience does) work in different ways with different presentations of energy... that being the case, it needs more varied tools.
I keep in mind that shiatsu is a recent development, born from more ancient disciplines (do-in, amma, tui na, kigong), therefore it is continually evolving. Now there are variations on Masunaga's Ideas by people like Ryoku Endo, and Pauline Sasaki.
peace, light,
Christien
om shanti -
-
Re: Different Shiatsu's Namikoshi and Zen
Fri, September 23, 2005 - 5:29 AMAloha,
I personally found that for me I got very caught up in all the endless information (mind) available and lost sight of what truly worked and felt right for me (heart) when I was beginning to learn. We do love the information my self included and it is a great source of entertainment for the mind. They are both valuable to learn at the start to give us a taste and understanding as a way to help guide us but the true wisdom is in our own heart which connects us to the true totality of ourselves. This is what I feel Masunaga was doing, following his own heart. We could potentially all come up with our own system because we are all individuated aspects of the whole. So one might say that Shiatsu is following your heart, just ask yourself what works best for you it might be many aspects of both great teachers lessons or something all your own.
Christopher
-
-
Re: Different Shiatsu's Namikoshi and Zen
Fri, September 23, 2005 - 8:58 AMMy Teacher, Shinzo Fujimaki, always says "In Shiatsu there is no mistake if it comes from your heart". He also says" The essence of shiatsu is like a mother's love"
-
-
-
Re: Different Shiatsu's Namikoshi and Zen
Mon, January 11, 2010 - 11:54 AMHi
To properly answer you questions.
#1 Namikoshi shiatsu is the official style of shiatsu of Japan
#2 only Namikoshi shiatsu is legalized in Japan.
#3 Namikoshi shiatsu compared to any other style or known as derived styles of shiatsu, Namikoshi shiatsu is about applying th eproper amount of pressure on contact on any part of the body.
#4 Namikoshi shiatsu is th only shiatsu style that 100% safe to do & to receive & is effective simultaneously, none of the derived style such as zen shiatsu can do this due to the use of joints and not base on proper amount of pressure on contact.
#5 Namikoshi shiatsu has only medical theory not TCM or Chakras, is this why this was the style of shiatsu legalized in Japan?
To know more about shiatsu please visit www.shiatsucenter.fi